
There seems to be a natural tendency among some skeptics and questioners that when part of a theory or concept is proven to be flawed, any and all other aspects about it should be dismissed as well.
This certainly seems to be the case for some AIDS dissidents when it comes to discussions about the significance of certain laboratory markers, in particularly certain immune cells involved in fighting infections, called CD4 t-cells. CD4 counts are, arguably, considered by mainstream AIDS experts as the single most important measure of disease progression and risk for patients acquiring opportunistic infections.
recent comments
SG on surviving "aids" without drugs
Fantastic! So great to see more brave people sharing their stories@0dca08fe0bb46b8f985b78f3c5f4918e:disqus My partner has...Onnie Mary Moyo Phuthe on Happy anniversary to resistance is fruitful
Compliments for 2012 Jonathan and keep up the great work. Surely today I understand that...Tony on Who needs t-cells, anyway?
Have you found a correlation between the clock and outdoor thermometer? How about between them...Carl on Who needs t-cells, anyway?
Brilliant, as ever.Guest on Talking to my (inner) self – Part 1
Dr Enlander in New York is using GCMAF for his CFS patients (plus looking at...Guest on Talking to my (inner) self – Part 1
For what it's worth now, the Cathcart video never mentioned making the solution at "home"...